![]() But since they both run Linux internally (and probably a Linux-compatible filesystem - does anyone know what kind?), there should be no reason why the 209 II edition should not work well with Linux - correct? At least as long as the Linux version supports samba shares. ![]() And does anyone have any experience with using the II edition with Linux? says the 209 II is designed for Windows & Mac, and that the 209 Pro version is for Linux. but that's much more expensive (too expensive for me), so I discarded that one as an option. But since the price for the two is exactly the same, I'm confused.and there's the Pro II edition, as you mentioned. One more question: What is really the difference between the 209 II and the 209 Pro, except for that the II-version has more memory? To me, it seems like the Pro edition offers a few more services, but that's all in software, right? So upgrading the firmware so that the 209 II can provide NFS service should be pretty straightforward.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |